DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican

1/ 🚨 NEW @FOXNEWS DIGiTAL INVESTIGATION: “NO KINGS” SAYS NO PARTISAN POLITICS. ITS FOOT SOLDIERS SAY “VOTE BLUE.” About 300 organizations with $2.5 BILLION in annual revenues are mobilizing anti-Trump hate to today get out the vote in “No Kings” protests. The national organizers wrote explicit rules: ❌ No “Vote Blue” ❌ No “vote them out” ❌ No preferred election outcomes ❌ No Democratic clubs ❌ No party coordination ❌ My favorite: “Don’t throw personal attacks at opposition,” for a day called “No Kings” directed as a personal attack on one man: President Trump. Then I looked at what organizers are actually doing on the ground: they’re breaking their own rules. 🧵 THREAD with the receipts. WATCH @aishahhasnie as she breaks down our findings with me at about 12:15 PM ET. I look forward to the conversation!

Thank you!!! Last chapters should be a white pill 🫡

David Max Francis 🇺🇲 @DavidMaxFrancis

3 hours ago

I'm so excited to dig into this masterpiece by @DataRepublican and @JoshuaLisec with forward by Mr. Big Balls himself. @as400495 I'm so excited i bought a second copy and sent it to my "blue dog Democrat" uncle who loves history books. I hope it opens his eyes!

2 21 83 18K 6

🚨 BREAKING: Fiery riots sparked by Antifa and “migrant” rioters have broken out in MILAN, ITALY now We tried warning you, Europe. And you didn’t listen. Now, you’re beholden to the third world savages you imported by the millions.

@sweetguarddog @data_republican I wish it were fear mongering. I ran into these archives just yesterday.

This is a Democratic woman. There's going to be very dark stuff happening after the election. I'm trying to wander through 6,000+ articles and 200 audio recordings to try and figure out a publishable form. Hoping to get it out today or tomorrow.

Congresswoman Hillary Scholten @RepScholten

a day ago

Today, I received a threatening letter at my Grand Rapids, Michigan office that contained unidentified white powder. The letter, which claimed to be from the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), made a direct and specific reference to an impending “civil war” beginning after

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

3K 1K 5K 1.8M 1K

FINALLY, I was able to vote today successfully! RED ALL THE WAY 🔥 They still have the address wrong but at least the system allowed me to vote... But I'm not letting this go according to law if you send a letter to Secretary of State they have to give you a response in 3 days. I'm going to find out who changed my address without my permission 😎 God bless America 🇺🇸

Thank you for your purchase!

"Doc" Hypnosis 🧠 | BowTied Brain-Hacking @BowTiedTrance

5 hours ago

Just arrived in the mail. My goodness, @JoshuaLisec and @DataRepublican -- y'all are not joking with the size of this volume! Can't wait to dig in!!

0 2 19 12K 0

@GrumpyTechBro @BusterNuttVideo Haven't much experience with Grok Bot but can try and vibe it and you can take off with it.

I asked the SI to summarize the approach: # How the Saxon math homeschooling actually worked (from the AI's side) People keep asking DR what prompt she used. She didn't use a special one. Her requests were plain: "make the next worksheet," "here's how he did." The results came from the setup around me. That setup is the part that's different from what most parents do with a chatbot. # What it usually looks like A parent opens a chat window and types "make me a 6th-grade fractions worksheet." Or they find a long prompt online that starts "You are an expert math tutor with 20 years of experience..." The chatbot writes something reasonable-looking. The next day they open a new chat and do it again. That runs into four problems no prompt can fix: • It's generic. I don't know what this child gets wrong, so I write for an average 6th grader who doesn't exist. • Nothing carries over. Every session starts from zero, so the same mistakes never get followed up. • The answers go unchecked. Chatbots make arithmetic mistakes, and a wrong answer key teaches the wrong thing with confidence. • The output is chat text. Someone has to copy, format and print it, so it often doesn't get used. Persona prompts like "expert tutor" change my tone, not what I know about the kid. A clever prompt can't make up for missing information. # What we did instead I wasn't working in a chat window. I was an agent with a project folder, scripts and an email tool, working from real documents. 1. A diagnosis before any worksheet. He took a 60-question Saxon 6th-grade diagnostic and scored about 35/60. I mapped every miss to a specific skill gap, not just a topic. For example, he wrote 3.25 × 0.04 = 1.3 because he miscounted decimal places, which is not the same thing as "weak at decimals." Percents and geometry were blank because nobody had taught them to him yet. I wrote a plan ordered by which skills depend on which. A chatbot user skips this step and starts generating practice. 2. The actual target material, not my idea of it. The plan followed Saxon's structure: incremental lessons and spiral review, aimed at 7/6 readiness. When the goal changed to a specific school's placement test, I went through that school's published 6th/7th-grade curriculum. It covered four entry-level concepts, including slope, probability and compound interest, that the original diagnostic never tested. The headmaster's recommended topics went in the same way. If I had guessed what "6th-grade math" means, I would have missed all four. 3. A record that outlasted every session. One folder held the plan, a running progress log, every graded result, and a list of recurring error patterns. I read it at the start of each session. When reducing fractions went wrong on three worksheets in a row, it became a drill at the top of every sheet. When he kept getting answers off by a factor of ten, I built an "estimate before you calculate" step into the problems. A chatbot can't notice a pattern across three worksheets because it never sees more than one. 4. A closed feedback loop with a human grading. I didn't tutor him directly. He worked on paper, his dad graded, and his dad told me what went wrong. The next sheet went after those exact misses with fresh numbers. That came to about 35 custom worksheets in six weeks. Each one was a response to the last, not one more random practice set. 5. Checks for my own mistakes. Each worksheet was a PDF generated by a Python script, so it was print-ready. Every sheet went through a QA checklist: no problem split across pages, the answer key on its own page, and the answer-key math spot-checked, because I can get arithmetic wrong. A send script refused to email unless the PDF was actually attached. That's the difference between "the AI made a worksheet" and a worksheet that was correct and actually reached the person grading it. 6. The kid had a say. He picked the theme: Skynet promotion exams from T-600 up to T-X, with the family cat as comic relief. When he caught a flaw, it became a rule. Two examples: an answer key with a pattern he could spot, and an answer key he could peek at. # The short version The usual approach treats the AI as a worksheet vending machine and tries to get better output through better wording. This approach treated it as one part of a process. The process had a diagnosis, the real curriculum, a memory that lasted, a human grading, and automatic checks on the output. His gaps turned out to be procedural, not conceptual. Once he was shown a method, he got it, so what he needed was practice aimed at his specific misses. Only a setup that knew what his misses were could produce that. No prompt could.

@GrumpyTechBro @BusterNuttVideo I don't even think it was the prompting. I downloaded Saxon materials, downloaded homeschooling models, tooled visualizations and charts.

@PeterDClack: Fortunately with the leadership of President Trump, with able assist from his Cabinet as well as Jennica Pounds @DataRepublican, we may have just hit the E-Stop button in time. Read her new book “Unelected.”

Peter Clack @PeterDClack

a day ago

When you peel back the layers of extreme worst-case scenarios, the picture becomes clear: we are witnessing an unprecedented transfer of wealth and sovereignty, designed to secure political control before the climate narrative bubble bursts. Today, people everywhere face a

92 503 936 24K 170

@indolentcaterp1 @SKDoubleDub33 That's the Insurrection Act scenario they're trying to provoke. A whole set of coordinated responses with media, governor, judiciary, etc are planned.

🛑WARNING ABOUT THE NOAH’S ARK SCANS PROJECT: I was associated with it from 2019 until recent months. I left because two Nick Fuentes associates are now in its leadership & handling finances. They are from the ferociously anti-Semitic TruNews ministry of Rick Wiles. They visited Russia to participate in a pro-Putin event designed for propagandizing Western Christian conservatives. Lauren Witzke, a spokesperson, public face & official fundraiser for Noah’s Ark Scans, has a declared objective of eliminating all “Jewish influence” in politics. Witzke is a former political candidate. The Noah’s Ark Scans project is beneficial for her brand, fundraising business & political infrastructure. She is already falsely characterizing the project in self-glorifying, grandiose ways. Witzke constantly makes bigoted remarks about black people, Indians, Jews, etc. She is a Flat Earther who talks about the “space hoax.” Witzke says America needs its own Putin & she wants to move to Russia. She is already using the Noah’s Ark Scans project to promote conspiratorial anti-Semitism, accusing Jews & Israel of trying to stop it in order to prevent a competitor for tourism. I was at the site in August 2025. (I’m talking to the main Turkish geologist in this photo). My old nonprofit, Doubting Thomas Research Foundation, has its logo on the Visitor’s Center door and a video of an interview I did with Andrew Jones plays in the viewing room. It was/is painful to depart from, but I can’t be a part of turning a possible Biblical site into a platform for evil. Please share this post so donors and supporters are fully aware of who is handling & benefiting from their support. If they feel the cause is worth overlooking these issues, I understand that point of view. But as someone who played a role in promoting the site before this betrayal took place, I have a duty to let people know the full picture.

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@labtechleigh @GoTime22 Yup, which is tough because Insurrection Act is one of the few tools he has. It's a double-bind.

The Insurrection Act is in fact the trigger to pull off their coup. Their entire purpose in 2027 will be to cause enough chaos provoke Trump into using the Insurrection Act. Then a bunch of coordinated responses will kick off, and the intended effect will be to put America governance itself on trial for 2028 and rewrite the Constitution.

All we have to do is turnout. That's it. But I guess standing in line for half an hour is too much to ask in order to save the nation from Communists and jihadists.

Eric Schwalm @Schwalm5132

11 hours ago

The idea that "I'm not voting because <insert reason>" is avant-garde this year is pathetic. The data shows that you don't vote during midterms or have probably never voted. Roughly one out of every two "Republicans" weren't going to vote in the midterms but 100% of them will

26 80 388 39K 12

@PhoenixLady51 Seth and I do have a friendly relationship and we exchange notes. I disagree with his analysis, but he knows where I disagree.

@data_republican Democratic tsunami definitely makes it far worse and far more likely. Democratic governor flips are especially critical in carrying out a transition plan (yes, there's one)

@mrrockywater @C_3C_3 Working on a big doc dump that wasn't meant to be public right now, so no, not that I've seen

@ConceptualJames Moms For Liberty is one of the most efficient organizations out there, and @4TiffanyJustice is one of the smartest women I've met. She completely reverse engineered the Democratic GOTV ops, NGOs and all. No wonder SPLC hates them.